I had a strange, visceral reaction to an article I read in this morning’s Orlando Sentinel. A new notebook computer has been invented, called the “Vinci,” designed for the 4-and-under set. Like the Ipad, it has a touch screen and can play music, videos and games. The Vinci, however, is encased in a rubber frame with easy-grab handles, so that a toddler can tote it along with him in the stroller, or drop it from his crib, without ruining the $400 device. This article alarmed me on a number of levels, but here’s what really made me wince: Engineer Dan Yang was inspired to invent the Vinci because her daughter had come to prefer Yang’s iPad to her baby toys before her first birthday.
I was trying to place the familiar shudder that went through me when reading this phrase, and realized that it was the same reaction I had on watching the viral YouTube video of a 2-year-old Indonesian child, sitting in a diaper and leather jacket on the front porch of his family’s one-room shack, chain-smoking cigarettes. His father supplied him with the cancer sticks—two packs per day–and encouraged him to perform tricks like blowing smoke rings for the British media that had come to film the spectacle. Here’s a link, in case you missed it:
I would argue that both providing a child who is still in diapers with a tablet computer, and doing little to discourage her preference for the shiny, ever-changing, mesmerizing screen to toys that promote interacting with others, mastering spatial relationships and learning life skills isn’t really all that different than filling up her bottle with strawberry daiquiris instead of formula. Both daiquiris and computer games are colorful and alluring and go down easy, and if used in excess, are addictive and destructive. To use either one in moderation requires a level of self-control far beyond the capacity of a preschooler.
After reading the aforementioned article over my morning coffee, we headed to church, where my husband and I teach Sunday School to a class of 24 second- and third-graders. Following an introductory art project, the kids were asked to sit on the carpet and listen to the story of Adam and Eve and original sin. The behavior I witnessed—almost exclusively among the boys, who outnumber the girls 2-to-1 in our class–was truly appalling. While the teacher, one of the 6 (!) of us necessary to ride herd on the class, sat on the carpet and told the story in an animated and engaging way, there were at any given time at least 4 different misbehaviors going on among the class. Children were hitting each other, having loud conversations with one another, blurting out irrelevant statements often involving the word “poopy,” and thrashing around on the floor and annoying fellow classmates. At least half of the children seemed completely incapable of sitting still for a 5-minute story, even one involving a serpent and nakedness. Interestingly, when the parents came to pick their kids up, I noticed “Brandon”, who had been particularly ill-behaved, try to get his father’s attention while his mother talked with another mom about last night’s cocktail party. The father was focusing intently on the screen of his smart phone held 8 inches in front of his nose, and paid no attention to Brandon, who was jumping on top of Dad’s loafers and hanging on his elbow.
I thought back to when I was in second and third grade. Both years, in my class of 30 students (taught by 1 teacher), there was one ‘bad’ boy who was a frequent discipline problem. I remember going home each day and dutifully reporting to my mother, in a tsk-tsk tone of voice, what antics Theron Wynn had performed that day. The other 29 students, for the most part, strove for the teacher’s approval, and were capable of sitting in a wooden desk for several hours per day while the teacher spoke. Being scolded by the teacher was a horrifying event. I can still vividly remember the two times I was publicly reprimanded by a teacher in my 19 years of schooling. Brrrr.
Back to Sunday School, there are a number of factors that likely contribute to the poor behavior of our class. Admittedly, some of the kids had already been called upon to sit still in an hour-long church service. And the teachers failed to clearly state the consequences for misbehavior at the beginning of class…mental note for next week. Still, I don’t think it’s a stretch to postulate that at least some of these children’s absolute inability to contain themselves for 300 seconds is a direct result of our providing children, from the time that they are able to grasp an object, electronics that offer constant, easy, and addictive stimulation. Toys that require concentration, effort and creativity – block sets, art supplies, and books — are little match for the exploding colors and sounds of an LCD screen. It’s a scary problem, and it’s likely going to get worse, with the advent of products designed to get kids hooked before they take their first steps.
What’s a parent to do? For starters, we as parents need to stop allowing our children to consume large portions of electronic mind candy before they’ve eaten their vegetables. This is hard, and requires effort on the part of the parent, who will need to spend more of his or her own time filling the time gap that technology can easily consume. It means engaging with your kids on car trips shorter than 2 hours, rather than automatically plugging in a video. It means conversing with them when you go out for dinner, rather than pacifying them with a DS or PSP so that the adults can talk. And it means regularly spending time together in the evenings playing board games or sports instead of each family member retreating to a separate technological lair.
Please don’t think I’m being holier-than-thou. I could write an equally long blog post on all the strategic blunders our family has made in our own war on technology creep. At least we didn’t buy our toddlers cigarettes.
I just wonder if we weren’t all better off when Angry Birds were merely a threat to the family cat and the Super Mario Brothers were a fireworks company from Jersey.











